alex.m.thompson
  • Home
  • Biography
  • Publications
  • Photos
  • Research
  • Collaborators
  • Blog

my thoughts on science

Two stories from the week

8/28/2015

0 Comments

 

This is just a short little post about some science that I read in the papers this week. These two stories were interesting for very different reasons.

The first one is something that you've probably seen on Facebook, but just in case you haven't I thought I'd share it. Danish researchers have predicted the distribution of mammals if humans have never existed: http://i100.independent.co.uk/article/what-the-world-would-look-like-if-humans-had-never-existed--WJmrb1dBlHg

This comes hot on the heals of other work that shows we are the most efficient hunter on the planet: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/forget-jaws-it-is-humans-who-are-the-worlds-top-predator-say-scientists-10464301.html

But work like this, while interesting, should not be taken as gospel. There are many assumptions that go into a prediction like this. And a big one that many people will probably point out is the assumption that we were the cause of the Pleistocene mega fauna extinction. To my understanding we most likely were, but there is still debate.

The second story is about ants who self medicate: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/ants-are-able-to-selfmedicate-by-changing-diet-when-they-are-unwell-in-first-for-insectkind-10467040.html

This is just cool research. It's by Finnish researchers and show that ants infected with a fungus will eat hydrogen peroxide, something that healthy ants won't do. Doing so reduces their risk of dying by 15%, but comes with a 20% risk of death. However, this fungal infection is deadly and can wreck colonies. The ants also dosed themselves. This adds to work showing that animals eat plants when sick or rub specific vegetation on them to reduce parasite load. It's also interesting because it shows a species with very limited cognitive capacity can appear to have such self awareness.

Sorry if the links aren't as easy to use. I'm writing this on my phone!

0 Comments

pesticides and birds

8/23/2015

0 Comments

 
The story of the dreaded neonicotinoids and there proposed deadly effect on Europes bees has been reported widely in the press over the last year or so. The story has gotten ugly as there have been claims and counter claims of dodgy science on both sides of the debate. But pesticides in general may be having an effect far wider than just on bees.

I'll state first up that I am not anti-pesticides. Without them modern agriculture couldn't exist, we'd have much higher food prices and no doubt people's diets would be worse for their absence. But they will have an environmental impact that is far less easy to detect than any 'endocrine disrupting' effect that groups like the Pesticide Action Network rave and shout about.  What is needed is an informed discussion about the risks that these chemicals have, not only to bees and humans but to wildlife further afield. Using long-term demographics and detailed studies of birds and other animals we can hope to determine these impacts. Unfortunately, many of the staunch anti-pesticide campaigners are also very anti GM: a technology that has the potential to actually reduce our impact on the environment and increase sustainability. 

Pesticides kill insects, that is what they are designed to do. Almost all non-ratpor or seabird species (I can't think of an easier way of writing this!), whether they as adults each insects or seeds, feed their chicks insects. As a food source, as many an alternative website will state, insects are very high in protein - the ideal thing for a growing chick! With the majority of the UK being either urban or under agriculture that leaves environments that are either a) probably fairly low in insects or b) get sprayed with pesticides to reduce the number of insects.  Many species of native British birds are on the decline, house sparrows declined by 71% between 1977 and 2008, common cuckoo number are hugely down, there is obviously a problem but is it a singular one or is each species decline due to their own specific factors? However unique the behaviour and ecology of each declining species, It seems that more and more studies and ornithologists are at least in part blaming pesticides for the reduction in bird numbers. If birds are unable to feed their offspring then recruiting individuals into the population is reduced, and as birds age or die from disease or predation then the population will decline. And if the adults themselves rely on insects for their own food then surviving or getting up to reproductive weight becomes even harder.


It is very difficult to show causation in situations like this, as all that most researchers have is historical records of bird populations and pesticide use. To complicate things further pesticides are not the only thing that can lead to a reduction in insect abundance. Changing land use practices, such as cutting down hedgerows or increasing stocking density are also likely to have impacts on insect abundance. Controlled trials where specific areas are allowed to use pesticides and others are not would be great, but they are expensive and, for an issue like this, long-term. And with our governments current track record for environmental experiments (i.e. the badger cull) few would likely trust the results.


However, the decline of British birds cannot be put solely at the feet of pesticides. Many of our birds have long and complex migrations which we are only now starting to understand. Changes in land use, hunting or a number of other things may be impacting them at various stages along their migrations. For example, in Malta every year thousands of migrating birds are shot - which I find repellent. The decline in insect numbers in the UK may also be due to climate change, insect populations are likely to decline as flowering times and insect emergence times become increasingly out of step.  

So conclusions? I don't have any. I'm just hoping that this issue gets wider attention and enters the debate into both the use of pesticides and the potential benefits of GM.
0 Comments

When two worlds COLLIDE - grouse shooting

8/14/2015

0 Comments

 
So this week saw the start of the annual grouse shooting season, the "glorious twelfth" or as many news papers reported it: the "inglorious twelfth." This controversial sport has received more media attention than ever this year because of the publication of a new study.

But the conflict between environmentalist and grouse shooting is a long standing one. There are the ethical and moral issues that are entangled with any hunting but they are also caught up in class and land ownership struggles in Scotland. This form of hunting is associated with strong association with falls in the numbers of birds of prey, most notably in the UK the hen harrier. Claims and counter claims about the meddling of conservation groups further cloud the issue for members of the public.But game keepers are regularly charged with poisoning these beautiful birds and they are found shot, poisoned and beaten to death. But grouse shooting is an economic boon for the Upland areas of Scotland, bringing in a reported £2bn a year, supporting many jobs and local businesses. 

This is when conservation is at its hardest, when the wishes of the "green faction" are so starkly opposed to economics. If protecting hen harriers was going to create jobs and bring in money then the argument would be easy and the species would be saved. In situations like this maybe the best course, and this is probably very controversial, is a middle course (very Buddhist of me!). Finding some way for jobs to be maintained because of the shoot, while also protecting the raptor species. Some form of RSPB stamp of approval for raptor friendly estates perhaps? EU grants to those who work with conservationists and change their ways? I'm not invested or knowledgeable about this conflict by any means and so for all I know these have been tried in the past. However, money is a huge lever for humans and so when economics is so against a conservation issue it really needs to be addressed.

But what of this new study that I mentioned at the top? Well it turns out, along with being bad for birds of prey, grouse shooting is contributing to climate change. This may be the lever that conservationists can use, for two reasons: firstly, climate change is a hot (pardon the pun) emotive issue that multiple people and campaigns can get behind, and secondly, some form of emissions tax is possible in the same way that it is imposed on big businesses. By burning the heathland the estates create better habitat for the grouse, but they are also burning large swathes of peatland. Peat is a carbon sink, so by burning this habitat they're causing a double whamy: releasing CO2 from the burnt plant material and stopping the peat from storing CO2. So maybe this can be this revelation is what can make the change, but with a Tory government in power and having already attempted to loosen the ban on fox hunting, I doubt they'll risk further reducing their support in Scotland by taking on the big estate owners. Oh, how fun it is to be politically cynical! 

The paper mentioned above:

Douglas et al. (2015) Vegetation burning for game management in the UK uplands is increasing and overlaps spatially with soil carbon and protected areas. Biological Conservation, 191:243-250
Burning for habitat management is globally widespread. Burning over carbon-rich soils is a global environmental concern due to the potential contribution to climate change. In the UK, upland heath and blanket bog, so-called 'moorland', often overlies carbon-rich soils, and has internationally important conservation value, but is burned as management for gamebird shooting and to a lesser extent for livestock grazing. There is little detailed information on the spatial extent or temporal trends in burning across the UK. This hinders formulation of policies for sustainable management, given that the practice is potentially detrimental for soil carbon storage, water quality and habitat condition. Using remotely sensed data, we mapped burning for gamebird management across c45 000 km2 of the UK. Burning occurred across 8551 1-km squares, a third of the burned squares in Scotland and England were on peat ≥ 0.5 m in depth, and the proportion of moorland burned within squares peaked at peat depths of 1–2 m. Burning was detected within 55% of Special Areas of Conservation and 63% of Special Protection Areas that were assessed, and the proportion of moorland burned was significantly higher inside sites than on comparable squares outside protected areas. The annual numbers of burns increased from 2001 to 2011 irrespective of peat depth. The spatial overlap of burning with peat and protected areas and the increasing number of burns require urgent attention, for the development of policies for sustainable management and reversal of damage to ecosystem services in the UK uplands.
LINK

 
0 Comments

Sneaky squirrels 

8/5/2015

0 Comments

 
One of my friends, Jamie Samson, has just had a paper published and it's pretty cool. He work on Cape ground squirrels, an animal that sends most of its day just calmly searching for food around their large burrows and then occasionally go crazy and have fights that could be scenes from the Matrix. These guys stash food away to save it for later in a behaviour known as caching. What Jamie found was that they pay attention to who is looking when they do it, to avoid being seen. This makes sense, as they can avoid their caches being stolen, but Jamie also found that the dominance rank impacted caching behaviour. Dominant individuals were less concerned with being observed than subordinates. It's cool work that builds on other investigations of caching species like scrub jays.

Samson & Manser (2015) Caching in the presence of competitors: Are Cape ground squirrels (Xerus inauris) sensitive to audience attentiveness? Animal Cognition 
When social animals cache food close to their burrow, the potential for an audience member to observe the event is significantly increased. As a consequence, in order to reduce theft it may be advantageous for animals to be sensitive to certain audience cues, such as whether they are attentive or not to the cache event. In this study, observations were made on three groups of Cape ground squirrels (Xerus inauris) in their natural habitat when they cached provisioned food items. When individuals cached within 10 m of conspecifics, we recorded the attentiveness (i.e. whether any audience members were orientated towards the cacher, had direct line of site and were not engaged in other activities) and identity of audience members. Overall, there was a preference to cache when audience members were inattentive rather than attentive. Additionally, we found rank effects related to cache avoidance whereby high-ranked individuals showed less avoidance to cache when audience members were attentive compared to medium- and low-ranked individuals. We suggest this audience sensitivity may have evolved in response to the difference in competitive ability amongst the ranks in how successful individuals are at winning foraging competitions. This study demonstrates that Cape ground squirrels have the ability to not only monitor the presence or absence of conspecifics but also discriminate individuals on the basis of their attentive state.
LINK
0 Comments

seagulls attacking women

8/2/2015

0 Comments

 
This week I was interested to see what sounded like some really cool new science reported in the Daily Mail, with the print headline of “Seagull gangs ‘are pricking on women.’” From briefly skimming the article it seemed that the much maligned blight of British seafronts had developed a novel foraging tactic, with “targets more likely to drop food when pecked.” The eponymous words of Jurassic Park rang through my head “clever girl.” But on a closer read it seems that this new revelation, reported as if it were fact, is just the opinion of two lifeguards, Ash and Becca. So is Mail is just reporting non-fact as fact once more?

 

On the face of it yes, as there doesn't appear to have been any research into this and it’s just someone’s view. But seagulls are smart and other smart birds have the ability to remember the faces of humans for decades, so it seems perfectly sensible to suggest that seagulls could tell men and women apart. But what about using some crazy foraging behaviour?

 

It turns out that there is actually precedent for targeting a subset of a population to steal food from. Fork-tailed drongos, amazingly acrobatic birds that have a dual impact on other species: they can act as a sentinel system, allowing others to spend more time foraging, and alerting them when predators are near but they can also make false alarms and steal food. So, there is a both a cost and a benefit to having these duplicitous birds around. I’ve blogged about some of the cool interactions of drongos before. Drongos follow pied babblers, with smaller babbler groups paying more attention to their sentinel behaviour than larger ones. The interesting thing is that within pied babbler groups some individuals respond more to drongo alarm calls than others, with juvenile birds more likely to respond. Drongos will actually preferentially target these juvenile birds, making their stealing more efficient. This is really similar to what the Mail suggests is happening on British beaches.

 

However, it still needs to be researched. So if anyone wants to fund me to go to the beach to collect data and run experiments…..

 

The above research is published in Ridley & Child (2009) Behav Ecol Sociobiol 63:1119-1126

 

Other cool drongo papers:

 

Flower & Gribble (2012)

Flower et al. (2014)

Flower (2011)




0 Comments

New babbler paper

8/1/2015

0 Comments

 
A new paper from Dave Humphries on the pied babblers, looking at sexual displays from subordinates.

Humphries et al (2015) Calling Where It Counts: Subordinate Pied Babblers Target the Audience of Their Vocal Advertisements. PLoS One, DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0130795
Abstract:
For territorial group-living species, opportunities to reproduce on the natal territory can be limited by a number of factors including the availability of resources within a territory, access to unrelated individuals, and monopolies on reproduction by dominant group members. Individuals looking to reproduce are therefore faced with the options of either waiting for a breeding opportunity to arise in the natal territory, or searching for reproductive opportunities in non-natal groups. In the cooperatively breeding Southern pied babbler, 
Turdoides bicolor, most individuals who achieve reproductive success do so through taking up dominant breeding positions within non-natal groups. For subordinate pied babblers therefore, searching for breeding opportunities in non-natal groups is of primary importance as this represents the major route to reproductive success. However, prospecting (where individuals leave the group to search for reproductive opportunities within other groups) is costly and individuals rapidly lose weight when not part of a group. Here we demonstrate that subordinate pied babblers adopt an alternative strategy for mate attraction by vocal advertisement from within their natal territories. We show that subordinates focus their calling efforts on the edges of their territory, and specifically near boundaries with neighbouring groups that have potential breeding partners (unrelated individuals of the opposite sex). In contrast to prospecting, calling individuals showed no body mass loss associated with this behaviour, suggesting that calling from within the group may provide a ‘cheap’ advertisement strategy. Additionally, we show that subordinates use information regarding the composition of neighbouring groups to target the greatest number of potential mating partners.
LINK
0 Comments

    Author

    I am a behavioural ecologist, my main interests revolve around familial conflicts and their resolutions. However, my scientific interests are fairly broad.

    View my profile on LinkedIn

    Archives

    October 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    December 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012

    Categories

    All
    90
    99 Percent Invisible
    99pi
    Africa
    Alien Species
    Allee Effect
    Altruism
    Amazon
    Andreas Wagner
    Anthropocene
    Apostle Bird
    Arabian Babbler
    Attenborough
    Babbler
    Badger Cull
    Badgers
    Banded Mongoose
    BBC
    Bee
    Big Bang Fair
    Bighorn Sheep
    Biodiversity
    Biological Control
    Biology
    Biology Letters
    Bird For Britain
    Birds
    Birthday
    Black Sparrowhawk
    Blogs
    Book
    Book Review
    Breeding
    Brood Parasitism
    Brown Tree Snake
    Burying Beetles
    Butterflies
    Butyric Acid
    Camel
    Cane Toad
    Chemicals
    Chernobyl
    Chimp
    Chronotype
    CITES
    Climate Change
    Cod
    Collaborations
    Color
    Colour
    Colour Vision
    Common Misunderstandings
    Communication
    Competition
    Conference
    Conflict
    Conservation
    Conservatism
    Conservative
    Cool Papers
    Cool Research
    Cooperation
    Crime
    Crows
    Cuckoo
    Dad Media
    Dailymail
    Dalai Lama
    Darting
    Darwin
    Darwin's Finches
    Deception
    Deception Africa
    Decision Making
    Deer
    DES
    Dieter Lukas
    Disney
    Diving
    Documentary
    Dominance
    Drongo
    Eavesdropping
    Economics
    Education
    Elephants
    Epigenetics
    EU
    Evil
    Evolution
    Evolutionary Approach
    Extracurricular
    Fear
    Fennec Fox
    Filming
    Fish
    Fittness
    Fitz
    Football
    Foraging
    Fork Tailed Drongo
    Fork-tailed Drongo
    Free Radicals
    Future
    Gastranaut
    Good Genes
    Ground Squirrel
    Group Living
    Grouse
    Guardian
    Hands
    Hedgehog
    Hero
    Home Advantage
    Honeyguide
    Hornbill
    Hot Birds
    Human
    Human Impact
    Human-wildlife Conflict
    Hummingbirds
    Inbreeding
    Intelligent Bird
    Interesting Research
    Intrasexual
    Invasive Species
    Isbe 2014
    Ivory
    Kalahari
    Kardashian
    Kenya
    Kids
    K-index
    Koala
    Language
    Larks
    Learning
    Long-term
    Male-male Competition
    Male Tenure
    Mantis
    Mating
    Meerkat
    Meta-analysis
    Mice
    Misconceptions
    Miya Warrington
    Mongoose
    Moths
    Mysogyny
    Natural Selection
    Nepotism
    Nestling Growth
    New Papers
    New Research
    Niche
    NO2
    Nuclear
    Old Boys Club
    Olfaction
    Ornithology
    Overfishing
    Owls
    Oxidative Stress
    Parental Care
    Peer Review
    Percy FitzPatrick Institute
    Pest Control
    Pesticides
    Phd
    Phd Comics
    Phenotypic Plasticity
    Pheromones
    Pied Babbler
    Pied Babblers
    Pied Crows
    PLoS One
    Poaching
    Podcasts
    Politcians
    Political Views
    Polymorphism
    Poor Reporting
    Population Change
    Population Decline
    Population Dynamics
    Precautionary Principle
    Public Understanding
    Raccoon
    Radiolab
    Raihani
    Random
    Raptors
    Reciprocity
    Red Deer
    Referendum
    Regulation
    Research
    Resource Dispersion Hypothesis
    Robin
    Rum
    Running
    Schools
    Science
    Science Education
    Science In The News
    Scientific Method
    Scimitarbill
    Scotland
    Seagull
    Sexism
    Sexual Conflict
    Sexual Selection
    Shrikes
    Signalling
    Singing
    Smell
    Sociality
    South Africa
    Speach
    Spring
    Stealing
    STEM
    STEMtech
    Stuff You Missed In History Class
    Stuff You Should Know
    Suppression
    Syntax
    SYSK
    Tamarisk
    TBT
    Teaching
    Temperature
    Theft
    Theory Of Mind
    The Telegraph
    The Times
    Tigers
    Tim Peake
    Top 10
    Tories
    Trees
    Uganda
    UK
    Urban
    Urban Animals
    Urbanisation
    Weaver
    Wheel
    Wild
    Winning
    Wood Wide Web
    World Cup
    World's Sneakiest Animals
    Wrinkle
    Youtube Channels
    Zebra Mussel

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.